Aging, Agency and Anti-Aging Discourses: A Mixed-Methods Study on Romanian Women 50+ and the Revival of Gustian Sociology
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
In recent decades, old age has increasingly been framed in aesthetic, commercial, and technological discourses. For older women in particular, old age has come to be depicted less and less naturally and more and more as a problem to be addressed or concealed, creating both symbolic exclusion and new markets for “peri-menopausal wellness” or “anti-aging” products. Digital culture intensifies these imperatives within a paradox in which older women become invisible within mainstream publicity while hyper-visible as targets for beauty and health markets. In Romania, these dynamics converge with a distinct post-socialist path. Women aged 50 and above were raised during the period of state socialism, which utilized femininity for demographic objectives while simultaneously limiting consumerism. Following the workshops of 1989, neoliberal principles emphasizing self-optimization, beauty, and digital skills brought forth new contradictions, resulting in many women navigating the tension between traditional caregiving roles and modern expectations for productivity and youthfulness. This article looks at how Romanian women over 50 respond to anti-aging narrative in virtual and corporeal spaces. Based on questionnaire data among respondents in the 50 Plus Community and ethnographic observation at a wellness workshop (“Am curajul să trăiesc!” [“I have the courage to live!”], May 2025), research balances quantitative scope and qualitative depth. It explores how women interpret, oppose, and recast cultural narratives about aging against the background of centennial reflections on Dimitrie Gusti’s first monographic field studies and his methodological spirit revived to respond to twenty-first-century challenges.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Azimi, A., et al. (2025). Bridging Theory and Practice in Healthy Aging: The Role of Wellness Tourism in Shaping Psychosocial Outcomes. Acta Psychologica, 257, 105062.
Banet Weiser, S. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Budini Gattai, F., & Musatti, T. (1999). Grandmothers’ Involvement in Grandchildren’s Care: Attitudes, Feelings and Emotions. Family Relations, 48(1), 35-42.
Bucur, B. (2017). Prolegomena to the Romanian Sociology and Historiography of Food. International Review of Social Research, 7(1).
Bucur, B. (2019). Sociologia Proastei Guvernări în România Interbelică. Bucharest: RAO.
Bucher, T. (2018). If... Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butler, J. (2021). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London: Routledge.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded Theory in Global Perspective: Reviews by International Researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9), 1074-1084.
Chelcea, L. (2003). Ancestors, Domestic Groups and the Socialist State: Housing Nationalization and Restitution in Romania. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45(4), 714-740.
Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Gilleard, C., & Higgs, P. (2000). Cultures of Ageing: Self, Citizen and the Body. London: Routledge.
Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2017). Confidence Culture and the Remaking of Feminism. New Formations, 91, 16-34.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
Gullette, M.M. (2004). Aged by Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gusti, D. (1938). Sociologia Monografică: Teorie și Metodă. Bucharest: Editura Științifică.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Hochschild, A. R. (1990). Ideology and emotion management: A perspective and path for future research, in T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 117-142). State University of New York Press.
Institutul Național de Statistică (INSSE). (2023). Anuarul Statistic al României 2023. Bucharest: INSSE.
Kittay, E.F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.
Kligman, G. (1998). The Politics of Reproduction in Ceaușescu’s Romania: A Case Study in Political Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lingel, J. (2021). The Gentrification of the Internet: How to Reclaim Our Digital Freedom. Oakland. CA: University of California Press.
Naples, N. A. (ed.) (2013 [2003]). Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis and Activist Research, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Nedelcu, M. (2017). Transnational Grandparenting in the Digital Age: Mediated Co-presence and Childcare in the Case of Romanian Migrants in Switzerland and Canada. European Journal of Ageing Springer, 14(4), 375-383.
Pew Research Center. (2023). Internet and Technology Use Among Older Adults: Trends and Insights. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (Eds.). (2011). New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sharma, S. (2017). In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics. Durham. NC: Duke University Press.
Sontag, S. (1972). The Double Standard of Aging. Saturday Review, September 23, 29-38.
Tolentino, J. (2019). The Age of Instagram Face. The New Yorker, December 12.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.
Tyler, I. (2020). Stigma: The Machinery of Inequality. London: Zed Books.
Van Dijk, J. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Woodward, K. (1991). Aging and Its Discontents: Freud and Other Fictions. Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press.