Cât de “prezenţi” sunt studenţii la şcoală? Angajamentul academic al studenţilor din zona transfrontalieră Ungaria-România How “Present” are Students in School? Students’ Academic Engagement in Hungarian-Romanian Cross-border Region Section Studies
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The issue of school dropout is increasingly found in research conducted in all European countries. The increased interest for this subject is justified in terms of the European objectives for 2020. If we look closely to school dropout and we define it as the final step of a long process of disengagement, then the attention of researchers should also be directed to the analysis of levels of commitment, student attachment to school and student academic integration. One of the main difficulties encountered in studies addressing this topic is the conceptual definition. In this study we use several scales to measure academic engagement and we identify three dimensions of student’ engagement, based on the conceptualization found in the scientific literature. Using data from HERD research project conducted between 2011 and 2012 in Hungary-Romania cross-border region, this paper shows that there are differences between universities found in this region, and also differences regarding some individual characteristics of students. Our main result refers to the characteristics of students’ groups at the university level and we argue that engagement is a result of a continuous process, closely linked to the choice of academic paths. In the final section of the paper, there are presented the main limitations of the research and directions to be followed in future studies.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L. și Furlong, M. J. (2008) Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct . Psychology in the Schools, 45, 5, 369-386.
Astin, A . W . (1964) Distribution of students among higher educational institutions . Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 5, 276-287.
Astin, A . W . (1984) Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education . Journal of College Student Development, 25, 297-308.
Bean, J. P. (1990) Why students leave: Insights from research, în D. Hossler și J. Bean (eds.), The strategic management of college enroll- ments, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 147-169.
Bean, J. P. (2005) Nine themes of college student retention, în A. Seidman (ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success, USA: American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers, 215-243.
Bucklin, R. W. și Bucklin, M. L. (1970) The Psychological Characteristics of the College Persistor and Leaver: A Review . Washington, D.C.: Office of Education Report, HE-002-154. Disponibil la http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED049709.pdf. Accesat în 18 noiembrie 2016. Chalmers, D. (2007) A review of Australian and international quality systems and indicators of learning and teaching, New South Wales, Australia: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Ltd .
Christenson, S. L., Sinclair, M. F., Lehr, C. A. și Godber, Y. (2001) Promoting successful school completion: Critical conceptual and methodological guidelines . School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 4, 468-484.
Coates, H. (2005) The Value of Student Engagement for Higher Education Quality Assurance . Quality in Higher Education, 11, 1, 25-36.
Coates, H. (2009) Engaging Students for Success. Australasian Student Engagement Report, Australasian Survey of Student Engagement, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) .
Coker, D.L. (1968) Diversty of Intellective and Non-Intellective Characteristics Between Persisting and Non-Persisting Students among Campuses . Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, D. C. Bureau of Research. ER-6-2728. Disponibil la http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED033645.pdf. Accesat în 28 ianuarie 2016.
Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B. și Aber, J. L. (1994) Educational risk and resilience in African‐ American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school . Child development, 65, 2, 493-506.
Curaj, A., Deca, L. și Hâj, C. M. (2015) Romanian Higher Education in 2009-2013. The Bologna Process and Romanian Priorities in the Search for an Active European and Global Presence, în A. Curaj, L. Deca, E. Egron-Polak & J. Salmi (Eds .), Higher Education Reforms in Romania, London: Spriger, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-
08054-3, 1-24.
Drăgoescu, R. M. (2013) Transformări în sis- temul de învățământ superior din România după 1990, Revista Română de Statistică, 3, 19-36.